Governança da educação por dados e dispositivos digitais: uma análise do Painel Educacional do MEQ
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Resumo
Este artigo analisa o Painel de Indicadores da Educação desenvolvido pelo Ministério da Educação do Quebec (MEQ), em um contexto no qual os dados digitais ocupam um lugar cada vez mais importante na governança escolar. O artigo apoia-se em contribuições da sociologia da quantificação, dos estudos críticos de dados e da teoria dos instrumentos de ação pública. A análise baseia-se em uma abordagem qualitativa, documental e centrada na interface, complementada por um exame dos documentos estratégicos que enquadram o painel de indicadores. Os resultados mostram que o painel privilegia uma representação do sistema educacional centrada em dimensões estritamente mensuráveis, como a diplomação, o desempenho nos exames ministeriais, as matrículas e os recursos, ao mesmo tempo que relega a segundo plano os processos pedagógicos, o trabalho educativo real e os contextos locais. Também evidenciam o papel estruturante da comparabilidade, os riscos de classificações implícitas e uma tendência à recentralização simbólica da condução educacional por meio dos dados. Os resultados indicam ainda que, apesar da heterogeneidade das datas de referência e dos estados de consolidação dos dados, a interface do painel tende a apresentar esses dados como sincrônicos e comparáveis, contribuindo assim para naturalizar sua atualidade e sua confiabilidade, ambas ainda passíveis de questionamento.
Downloads
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Este trabalho encontra-se publicado com a Licença Internacional Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-CompartilhaIgual 4.0.
Referências
Ball, S. J. (2003). The teacher’s soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy, 18(2), 215-228. https://doi.org/10.1080/0268093022000043065 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0268093022000043065
Beer, D. (2019). The data gaze: Capitalism, power and perception. SAGE Publications. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526463210
Boutigny, F. (2021). La compétence empêchée : étude en immersion dans une industrie de process sur l'organisation du travail et ses invisibles dysfonctionnements qui bloquent le pouvoir d'agir du collectif [thèse de doctorat, Université de Strasbourg, France]. HAL Thèses. https://theses.hal.science/tel-04141690v1
Collin, S., et Hennetier, C. (2024). Gouverner l’école à l’heure de l’IA : synthèse des connaissances sur la gouvernance scolaire basée sur les données. Médiations et médiatisations, (18), 43-66. https://doi.org/10.52358/mm.vi18.412 DOI: https://doi.org/10.52358/mm.vi18.412
Denouël, J., et Granjon, F. (2011). Communiquer à l’ère numérique : figures de la surveillance et de la reconnaissance. CNRS Éditions. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/books.pressesmines.387
Denzin, N. K. (2012). Triangulation 2.0. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(2), 80-88. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689812437186 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689812437186
Desrosières, A. (1993). La politique des grands nombres : histoire de la raison statistique. La Découverte.
Espeland, W. N., et Sauder, M. (2007). Rankings and reactivity: How public measures recreate social worlds. American Journal of Sociology, 113(1), 1-40. https://doi.org/10.1086/517897 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/517897
Espeland, W. N., et Sauder, M. (2016). Engines of anxiety: Academic rankings, reputation, and accountability. Russell Sage Foundation.
Espeland, W. N., et Stevens, M. L. (2008). A sociology of quantification. European Journal of Sociology, 49(3), 401-436. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003975609000150 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003975609000150
Feenberg, A. (2010). Between reason and experience: Essays in technology and modernity. MIT Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/8221.001.0001
Glaymann, D. (2025). Enseignants-chercheurs : un grand corps malade. Le Bord de l'eau.
Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69(1), 3-19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.1991.tb00779.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.1991.tb00779.x
Jarke, J., et Breiter, A. (2019). The datafication of education. Learning, Media and Technology, 44(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2019.1573833 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2019.1573833
Kamanzi, P. C., Lapointe, P., et Dembélé, M. (2019). The Implementation of Results-Based Management in Quebec: Between School Principals’ Optimism and Teachers’ SkepticismLa mise en œuvre de la gestion axée sur les résultats au Québec. Revue suisse de sociologie, 45(3), 427-445. https://doi.org/10.2478/sjs-2019-0020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/sjs-2019-0020
Kitchin, R. (2014). The data revolution: Big data, open data, data infrastructures and their consequences. SAGE Publications. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473909472
Lapointe, P., et Brassard, A. (2018). La conciliation des pressions internes et externes dans la mise en œuvre de la gestion axée sur les résultats par des directions d’établissement d’enseignement. Éducation et francophonie, 46I(1), 161-177. https://doi.org/10.7202/1047141ar DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/1047141ar
Lascoumes, P., et Le Galès, P. (2004). Gouverner par les instruments. Presses de Sciences Po. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/scpo.lasco.2005.01.0357
Light, B., Burgess, J., et Duguay, S. (2016). The walkthrough method: An approach to the study of apps. New Media & Society, 20(3), 881-900. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816675438 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816675438
Lingard, B. (2011). Policy as numbers: Ac/counting for educational research. The Australian Educational Researcher, 38(4), 355-382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-011-0041-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-011-0041-9
Maroy, C. (2021). L’école québécoise à l’épreuve de la gestion axée sur les résultats : sociologie de la mise en œuvre d’une politique néo-libérale. Presses de l’Université Laval. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9782763738352
Maroy, C., Brassard, A., Mathou, C., Vaillancourt, S., et Voisin, A. (2017). La co-construction de la gestion axée sur les résultats. McGill Journal of Education, 52(1), 93-113. https://doi.org/10.7202/1040806ar DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/1040806ar
Maroy, C., et Voisin, A. (2017). Accountability. Dans A. Van Zanten (dir.), Dictionnaire de l’éducation (nouvelle éd., p. 1-4). Presses universitaires de France.
Marres, N. (2012). The redistribution of methods: On intervention in digital social research, broadly conceived. The Sociological Review, 60(1), 139-165. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2012.02121.x
Marres, N., et Gerlitz, C. (2015). Interface methods: Renegotiating relations between digital research, STS and sociology. The Sociological Review, 64(1), 21-46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954X.12314
Mennicken, A., et Espeland, W. N. (2019). What’s new with numbers? Sociological approaches to the study of quantification. Annual Review of Sociology, 45, 223-245. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-073117-041343 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-073117-041343
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., et Saldaña, J. (2020). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). SAGE.
Ministère de l’Éducation du Québec (2017). Politique de la réussite éducative. Gouvernement du Québec.
Ministère de l’Éducation du Québec (2023). Plan stratégique 2023-2027. Gouvernement du Québec.
Ministère de l’Éducation du Québec (2024, 19 mars). Modernisation du réseau de l’éducation : un nouveau tableau de bord pour appuyer le réseau scolaire. Gouvernement du Québec. https://www.quebec.ca/nouvelles/actualites/details/modernisation-du-reseau-de-leducation-un-nouveau-tableau-de-bord-pour-appuyer-le-reseau-scolaire-54400
Organisation de coopération et de développement économiques (2020). PISA 2018 results (Volume I): What students know and can do. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5f07c754-en DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/5f07c754-en
Pollitt, C., et Bouckaert, G. (2017). Public management reform: A comparative analysis (4e éd.). Oxford University Press.
Porter, T. M. (1996). Trust in numbers: The pursuit of objectivity in science and public life. Princeton University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400821617
Rhoten, D., Carnoy, M., Chabran, M., et Elmore, R. (2003). The conditions and characteristics of assessment and accountability: The case of four states. Dans M. Carnoy, R. Elmore et L. Siskin (dir.), The new accountability: High schools and high stakes testing (p. 13-54). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203465639
Rogers, R. (2013). Digital methods. MIT Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/8718.001.0001
Voisin, A. (2024). Instruments d’accountability et équité scolaire dans les systèmes éducatifs d’Europe et du Canada : analyse du PISA 2012. Canadian Journal of Education / Revue canadienne de l'éducation, 47(2), 438-465. https://doi.org/10.53967/cje-rce.5513 DOI: https://doi.org/10.53967/cje-rce.5513
Williamson, B. (2017). Big data in education: The digital future of learning, policy and practice. SAGE Publications. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529714920