Educational Digital Compass: The Development of a Self-assessment Tool for Teachers’ Digital Pedagogical Use

Main Article Content

Alain Stockless
Villeneuve
Bédard
Jérémie Bisaillon
Chantal Tremblay
Diane Leduc

Abstract

Digital competency development among teachers is an essential issue for ensuring that the potential of digital technology is adequately operationalized in a learning context. To do this, the evaluation of the pedagogical use of digital technologies must adequately account for the state of the situation and then to implement strategies that respond to the needs of different communities. In this vein, this article analyzes the development of a self-assessment tool for pedagogical uses of digital technologies. The tool was developed in collaboration with the community, is based on cognitive processes and levels of conceptual interaction frameworks and uses the Designed-Based Research approach for its methodology.

Article Details

How to Cite
Stockless, A., Villeneuve, Bédard, Bisaillon, J., Tremblay, C., & Leduc, D. (2022). Educational Digital Compass: The Development of a Self-assessment Tool for Teachers’ Digital Pedagogical Use. Mediations and Mediatizations, (12), 144–157. https://doi.org/10.52358/mm.vi12.297
Section
Practitioners' articles
Author Biography

Alain Stockless, Université du Québec à Montréal

Alain Stockless est professeur au département de didactique de l'UQAM. Son domaine d’expertise porte sur les technologies éducatives, la formation en ligne et sur les environnements numériques d’apprentissage. Il possède aussi une expertise sur l’utilisation du numérique en situation éducative. Il s’intéresse également au développement de compétences TIC chez les enseignants et à l’adoption des innovations pédagogiques avec le numérique. Actuellement, il concentre ses travaux de recherche sur le design pédagogique et sur l’amélioration de l’expérience éducative dans des environnements numériques d’apprentissage.

References

Albion, P. R., Tondeur, J., Forkosh-Baruch, A. et Peeraer, J. (2015). Teachers’ professional development for ICT integration: towards a reciprocal relationship between research and practice. Education and Information Technologies, 20(4), 655-673. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-015-9401-9

Anderson, L. W. et Krathwohl , D. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.

Anderson, T. et Shattuck, J. (2012). Design-Based Research: A Decade of Progress in Education Research? Educational researcher, 41(1), 16-25. http://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X11428813

Andrade, H. L. (2019). A critical review of research on student self-assessment. Frontiers in Education, 4(August 2019), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00087

Archambault, J.-P. (2009). Fracture et solidarité numériques. EpiNet, 117(1). http://www.epi.asso.fr/revue/articles/a0909b.htm

Barab, S. et Squire, K. (2004). Design-Based Research: Putting a Stake in the Ground. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1301_1

Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives. Vol. 1: Cognitive domain. New York: McKay, 20, 24.

Brown, G. et Harris, L. (2013). Student self-assessment. Dans J. H. McMillan (dir.), SAGE Handbook of Research on Classroom Assessment (p. 367-393). Thousand Oaks. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452218649.n21

Conseil supérieur de l'éducation. (2020). Éduquer au numérique, Rapport sur l’état et les besoins de l’éducation 2018-2020. https://www.cse.gouv.qc.ca/publications/eduquer-au-numerique-50-0534/j

DeVellis, R., F. et Thorpe, C. T. (2022). Scale development: Theory and applications (5e éd.). SAGE Publications.

Faddar, J., Vanhoof, J. et De Maeyer, S. (2018). School self-evaluation: self-perception or self-deception? The impact of motivation and socially desirable responding on self-evaluation results. School effectiveness and school improvement, 29(4), 660-678. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2018.1504802

Hancock, R., Knezek, G. et Christensen, R. (2007). Cross-validating measures of technology integration: A first step toward examining potential relationships between technology integration and student achievement. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 24(1), 15. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ833923

Kimmons, R., Graham, C. R. et West, R. E. (2020). The PICRAT model for technology integration in teacher preparation.

Contemporary issues in technology and teacher education, 20(1), 176-198. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/210228/

Knezek, G. et Christensen, R. (2016). Extending the will, skill, tool model of technology integration: Adding pedagogy as a new model construct. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 28(3), 307-325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-016-9120-2

Koehler, M. J. et Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge. Contemporary issues in technology and teacher education, 9(1), 60-70. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/29544/

Koehler, M. J., Shin, T. S. et Mishra, P. (2012). How do we measure TPACK? Let me count the ways. Dans Educational technology, teacher knowledge, and classroom impact: A research handbook on frameworks and approaches (p. 16-31). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60960-750-0.ch002

List, A., Brante, E. W. et Klee, H. L. (2020). A framework of pre-service teachers’ conceptions about digital literacy: Comparing the United States and Sweden. Computers & Education, 148, 103788. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103788

Mattar, J., Ramos, D. K. et Lucas, M. R. (2022). DigComp-Based Digital competence Assessment Tools: Literature Review and Instrument Analysis. Education and Information Technologies, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11034-3

Ministère de l'Éducation et de l'Enseignement supérieur. (2019). Cadre de référence de la compétence numérique. Ministère de l'Éducation et de l'Enseignement supérieur. Gouvernement du Québec. http://www.education.gouv.qc.ca/fileadmin/site_web/documents/ministere/Cadre-reference-competence-num.pdf

Moore, M. G. (1989). Three types of interaction. American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923648909526659

Moore, M. G. (2013). The Theory of Transactional Distance. Dans M. G. Moore (dir.), Handbook of distance education (3e éd., p. 66-85). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203803738

Reisoğlu, İ. et Çebi, A. (2020). How can the digital competences of pre-service teachers be developed? Examining a case study through the lens of DigComp and DigCompEdu. Computers & Education, 156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103940

Resnick, P. et Varian, H. R. (1997). Recommender systems. Communications of the ACM, 40(3), 56-58. https://doi.org/10.1145/245108.245121

Ricci, F., Rokach, L. et Shapira, B. (2015). Introduction to recommender systems handbook. Dans Recommender systems handbook (p. 1-35). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7637-6_1

Schmidt, D. A., Baran, E., Thompson, A. D., Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J. et Shin, T. S. (2009). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) the development and validation of an assessment instrument for preservice teachers. Journal of research on technology in education, 42(2), 123-149. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2009.10782544

Starkey, L. (2020). A review of research exploring teacher preparation for the digital age. Cambridge Journal of Education, 50(1), 37-56. http://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2019.1625867

Stockless, A. et Beaupré, J. (2014). La compétence TIC chez les enseignants du primaire et du secondaire. Rapport du sondage technopédagogique. http://blogues.csaffluents.qc.ca/recit/files/2014/12/2014_1209_Rapport_technopedagogique_Final.pdf

Stockless, A. et Villeneuve, S. (2017). Développer ses compétences numériques : doit-on devenir un expert ? Dans M. Romero, B. Lille et A. Patini (dir.), Usages créatifs du numérique pour l’apprentissage au XXIe siècle (p. 141-150). Presses de l'Université du Québec.

Stockless, A., Villeneuve, S. et Beaupré, J. (2018). La compétence TIC des enseignants du primaire et du secondaire : un état de la situation. Formation et profession, 26(1), 109-124. http://doi.org/doi:10.18162/fp.2018.402

Tondeur, J., Petko, D., Christensen, R., Drossel, K., Starkey, L., Knezek, G. et Schmidt-Crawford, D. A. (2021). Quality criteria for conceptual technology integration models in education: bridging research and practice. Educational Technology Research and Development, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09911-0

Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Sang, G., Voogt, J., Fisser, P. et Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2012). Preparing pre-service teachers to integrate technology in education: A synthesis of qualitative evidence. Computers & Education, 59(1), 134-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.009

Villeneuve, S., Stockless, A., Beaupré, J. et Bisaillon, J. (2018). Évolution de la compétence numérique d'enseignants : recul, statu quo ou progression? Actes de colloque de la CIRTA 2017. Ouvrir les murs de la classe avec le numérique, Montréal. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.28301.79844

Villeneuve, S., Stockless, A. et Bissaillon, J. (2021). Analyse de l’utilisation du numérique en enseignement primaire et secondaire au Québec pour se constituer des réseaux d'échange et de formation continue. Dans F. Gravelle, N. Frigon et J. Monette (dir.), Transformation numérique de l'établissement d'enseignement : partage de pratiques professionnelles (p. 119-138). Presses de l’Université du Québec.

Voogt, J. et McKenney, S. (2017). TPACK in teacher education: are we preparing teachers to use technology for early literacy? Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 26(1), 69-83. http://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2016.1174730

Zimmerman, B. J. et Schunk, D. H. (2011). Self-regulated learning and performance: An introduction and an overview. Dans Handbook of Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance (p. 1-12). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203839010