Digital Technology for Better Adaptation to Learners: The Learner at the Heart of Digital Learning

Main Article Content

François Hatot
Alain Stockless
Sophie Brière
Baptiste Doucey
Patrick Plante

Abstract

This issue highlights the challenges related to digital accessibility and equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) in education. It stresses the need to adapt training to diverse learner profiles, whether in initial, continuing, or organizational contexts. Emphasis is placed on innovative and flexible pedagogical approaches that integrate digital tools to foster engagement, motivation, and perseverance. Implementing inclusive practices requires new professional skills for educational and institutional staff, raising questions about well-being at work and governance. This thematic issue brings together ten research articles, five practitioner contributions, and one critical debate. The research covers diverse contexts—schools, universities, educational organizations, national and international approaches—exploring varied methodologies and analyzing tensions between learner inclusion and staff support. Practitioner articles offer experiential perspectives from the field, showcasing strategies, sometimes improvised, to foster inclusion. Finally, the debate section examines blind spots in EDI and accessibility research, inviting us to go beyond assumptions. Overall, this issue offers a multidisciplinary framework for reflecting on 21st-century educational challenges.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Hatot, F., Stockless, A., Brière, S., Doucey, B., & Plante, P. (2025). Digital Technology for Better Adaptation to Learners: The Learner at the Heart of Digital Learning. Mediations and Mediatizations, (21), 4–11. https://doi.org/10.52358/mm.vi21.503
Section
Editorial

References

Annoot, E., Bobineau, C., Daverne-Bailly, C., Dubois, E., Piot, T. et Vari, J. (2019). Politiques, pratiques et dispositifs d’aide à la réussite pour les étudiants des premiers cycles à l’université : bilan et perspectives. Paris : CNESCO. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02342790

CFSG (2020). Introduction à l’équité, la diversité et l’inclusion en enseignement supérieur et en recherche. Quoi et pourquoi? Chaire pour les femmes en sciences et en génie. Québec. https://cfsg.espaceweb.usherbrooke.ca/download/4456/

Conseil supérieur de l'éducation (2019). Les réussites, les enjeux et les défis en matière de formation universitaire au Québec. Le Conseil. https://www.cse.gouv.qc.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/50-0521-avis-reussites-enjeux-defis-universitaire-1.pdf

Denoyel, N. (1999). Alternance tripolaire et raison expérientielle à la lumière de la sémiotique de Peirce. Revue française de pédagogie, 35-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3406/rfp.1999.1072

Ebersold, S. (2015). Accessibilité, politiques inclusives et droit à l’éducation : considérations conceptuelles et méthodologiques. ALTER, European Journal of Disability Research, (9), 22-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alter.2014.06.001

Ebersold, S. (2019). La grammaire de l’accessibilité. Éducation et Sociétés, 44(2), 29-47. https://doi.org/10.3917/es.044.0029 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/es.044.0029

Esparza, C. J., Simon, M., London, M. R., Bath, E., et Ko, M. (2024). Experiences of Leaders in Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in US Academic Health Centers. JAMA Network Open, 7(6). https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.15401 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.15401

European Commission (2022). Towards equity and inclusion in higher education in Europe. Publications Office of the European Union. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2797/631280

Harpur, P., Szucs, B., Fisher, J., et Pachana, N. A. (2025). Insights from the chancellery: Considerations for a university lead on equity, diversity, and inclusion. Higher Education Research & Development, 44(2). http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/07294360.2024.2399078 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2024.2399078

Hatot, F. (2023). Accessibilité Numérique. Doucey, B. et Goï, C. (dir.). Vocabulaire de l’ingénierie pédagogique. PUFR. https://hal.science/hal-04147120

Joynes, C., Rossignoli, S. et Amonoo-Kuofi, E. F. (2019). 21st Century Skills: evidence of issues in definition, demand and delivery for development contexts [rapport]. Department for International Development, Royaume-Uni. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5d71187ce5274a097c07b985/21st_century.pdf

Ministère de l'Éducation et de l'Enseignement supérieur (2018). Plan stratégique 2017-2018. Gouvernement du Québec.

Pelletier, K., Robert, J., Muscanell, N., McCormack, M., Reeves, J., N., A. et Grajek, S. (2023). 2023 EDUCAUSE Horizon Report. Teaching and Learning Edition. Louisville, CO: EDUCAUSE. https://www.learntechlib.org/d/222401

Plantard, P. (2014). Usages des technologies numériques: innovations et imaginaires. Dans P. Musso (dir.), Industrie, imaginaire et innovation, 57-68. https://hal.science/hal-01739497/document

Stockless, A. et Brière, S. (2024). How to encourage inclusion in a qualitative research project using a Design-Based Research methodology. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 23(1-9). https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069241227852 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069241227852

UNESCO (2021). Repenser nos futurs ensemble. Nouveau contrat social pour l’éducation. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000379705

UNESCO (2023). Global Education Monitoring Report 2023: Technology in education – A tool on whose terms? https://doi.org/10.54676/UZQV8501 DOI: https://doi.org/10.54676/UZQV8501