Inteligência Artificial e educação, entre injunções paradoxais e um futuro desejável
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Resumo
Com o forte desenvolvimento da educação digital nos últimos anos, os professores devem hoje integrar esta temática nas suas atividades em sala de aula. Da iniciação à programação à educação para a mídia, passando pela descoberta dos usos digitais, alguns deles estão, portanto, em plena transformação das suas práticas. Ao mesmo tempo, também lhes é pedido que eduquem os seus alunos para a sustentabilidade, mesmo que o impacto negativo do digital neste ponto, e particularmente da inteligência artificial, seja cada vez mais apontado. Mas então, como é que os professores vivem essas duas exigências que podem parecer paradoxais? E como conseguem posicionar-se e encarar o seu futuro pessoal e profissional num mundo em que o digital assumiu um papel tão importante? Por outras palavras, estamos hoje formando professores resistentes ao digital ou tecno-solucionistas? É, portanto, essa ligação entre tecnologia digital e desenvolvimento sustentável que estará no centro deste artigo. Para responder a essa pergunta, realizamos um estudo sobre as práticas digitais dos professores em formação e a sua visão do futuro, que apresentamos neste artigo, com o objetivo de compreender a sua visão do mundo para melhor orientá-los no acompanhamento dos alunos.
Downloads
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Este trabalho encontra-se publicado com a Licença Internacional Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-CompartilhaIgual 4.0.
Referências
Anderies, J., et Janssen, M. (2013). Robustness of social-ecological systems: Implications for public policy. Policy Studies Journal, 41(3), 513-536. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12027 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12027
Autin, W. J. (2016). Multiple dichotomies of the Anthropocene. The Anthropocene Review, 3(3), 218-230. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053019616646133 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2053019616646133
Baidoo-Anu, D., et Owusu Ansah, L. (2023). Education in the era of generative artificial intelligence: Understanding the potential benefits of ChatGPT in promoting teaching and learning. Journal of AI, 7(1), 52-62. https://doi.org/10.61969/jai.1337500 DOI: https://doi.org/10.61969/jai.1337500
Bick, A., Blandin, A., et Deming, D. J. (2026). The rapid adoption of generative AI. Management Science. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2025.02523 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2025.02523
Blanc, N., Ader, M., Berlantini, G., Coumoul, X., Depoux, A., Devès, M., Gaillardet, J., Hillenkamp, I., Magnan, C., Milon, A S., Reber, B., et Revet, S. (2025). Vers une science de l’habitabilité de la Terre. Centre des Politiques de la Terre, Université Paris Cité. https://cloud.u-paris.fr/s/ckpJBPBzrWPfmAM?dir=/&editing=false&openfile=true
Boschetti, F., Price, J., et Walker, I. (2016). Myths of the future and scenario archetypes. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 111, 76-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.06.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.06.009
Bronner, G. (2025). À l’assaut du réel. PUF.
Brynjolfsson, E., Li, D., et Raymond, L. (2025). Generative AI at work. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 140(2), 889 942. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjae044 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjae044
Cassou-Noguès, P. (2022). La bienveillance des machines : comment le numérique nous transforme à notre insu. Seuil.
Citton, Y. (dir.), (2014). L’économie de l’attention : nouvel horizon du capitalisme? La Découverte. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/dec.citto.2014.01.0007
Coeckelbergh, M. (2022). The political philosophy of AI: An introduction. Polity Press.
Collin, S., Lepage, A. et Nebel, L. (2023). Enjeux éthiques et critiques de l’intelligence artificielle en éducation : une revue systématique de la littérature. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology / Revue canadienne de l’apprentissage et de la technologie, 49(4), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.21432/cjlt28448 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21432/cjlt28448
Collin, S., Lepage, A., et Nebel, L. (dir.). (2022). Le numérique en éducation et formation : approches critiques. Presses des Mines. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/mines.colli.2022.01.0019
Crawford, K. (2024). Generative AI’s environmental costs are soaring—and mostly secret. Nature, 626, 693. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-024-00478-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-024-00478-x
Fleury, C. (2023). La Clinique de la dignité. Seuil.
Gagnon, M. (2008). Étude sur la transversalité de la pensée critique comme compétence en éducation : entre « science et technologie », histoire et philosophie au secondaire. (thèse de doctorat, Université Laval, Canada). https://corpus.ulaval.ca/handle/20.500.11794/20090
Haddock, A., Ward, N., Yu, R., et O’Dea, N. (2022). Positive Effects of Digital Technology Use by Adolescents: A Scoping Review of the Literature. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(21), 14009. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192114009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192114009
Hamant, O. (2023). Antidote au culte de la performance : la robustesse du vivant. Gallimard.
Hervé, N. (2022). L’éducation au futur. Une ressource pour penser l’anthropocène. Spirale – Revue de recherches en éducation, 70(2), 113-123. https://doi.org/10.3917/spir.070.0113 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/spir.070.0113
Hickman, C., Marks, E., Pihkala, P., Clayton, S., Lewandowski, R. E., Mayall, E. E., Wray, B., Mellor, C. et Van Susteren, L. (2021). Climate anxiety in children and young people and their beliefs about government responses to climate change: a global survey. The Lancet Planetary Health, 5(12), e863-e873. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanplh/article/PIIS2542-5196(21)00278-3/fulltext DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(21)00278-3
Jacobides, M. G., Gawer, A., Lang, N., et Martínez, D. Z. (2026). The political economy and geopolitics of AI regulation. Management and Business Review, 5(4), 38-51. https://doi.org/10.1177/2694104X251404322 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2694104X251404322
Jacobson, S., Myung, E., et Johnson, S. (2016). Open media or echo chamber: the use of links in audience discussions on the Facebook Pages of partisan news organizations. Information, Communication & Society, 19(7), 875-891. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1064461 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1064461
Lussault, M. (2024). Cohabitons! Pour une nouvelle urbanité terrestre. Seuil.
Marques, J. (2022). L’Intelligence artificielle, une approche intersectionnelle. Interfaces numériques, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.25965/interfaces-numeriques.4796 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25965/interfaces-numeriques.4796
Marzo, C. et Casilli, A. A. (2025). Réguler le travail caché de l’intelligence artificielle. Revue de droit du travail, (09), 520 529.
McAdams, D. P., et de St. Aubin, E. (1992). A theory of generativity and its assessment through self-report, behavioral acts, and narrative themes in autobiography. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(6), 1003 1015. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.62.6.1003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.62.6.1003
Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. New York University Press.
Ouellet, M. (2021). Pour une théorie critique de la gouvernance algorithmique et de l’intelligence artificielle. tic&société, 15(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.4000/ticetsociete.5603 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/ticetsociete.5603
Pötzsch, H. (2019). Critical digital literacy: Technology in education beyond issues of user competence and labour-market qualifications. TripleC, 17(2), 221-240. https://doi.org/10.31269/triplec.v17i2.1093 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31269/triplec.v17i2.1093
Raworth, K. (2018). La théorie du donut. L’économie de demain en 7 principes. Plon.
Roxin, I. (2025, 3 juillet). IA générative : le risque de l’atrophie cognitive. Polytechnique Insights. https://www.polytechnique-insights.com/tribunes/neurosciences/ia-generative-le-risque-de-latrophie-cognitive/
Schmoll, P. (2024). Le futur a-t-il un avenir? Vers un renouveau de la prospective. Cahiers de Systémique, 4, p.143-161. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14833353
Steffen, W., Sanderson, R. A., Tyson, P. D., Jäger, J., Matson, P. A., et Moore, B. (2005). Global change and the earth system: a planet under pressure. Springer DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/b137870
Tan, X., Cheng, K. S., et Ling, M. H. A. (2025). Artificial intelligence in teaching and teacher professional development: A systematic review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8, Article 100355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100355 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100355
United Nations Environment Programme. (2024). Artificial Intelligence (AI) end-to-end: The environmental impact of the full AI lifecycle needs to be comprehensively assessed. United Nations Environment Programme. https://www.unep.org/resources/report/artificial-intelligence-ai-end-end-environmental-impact-full-ai-lifecycle-needs-be
Ward, A. M. (2016). A critical evaluation of the validity of episodic future thinking: A clinical neuropsychology perspective. Neuropsychology, 30(8), 887. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/neu0000274