Colaboração on-line por parte dos alunos: contextos distintos e possível valor agregado em termos de descoberta coletiva?
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Resumo
Os alunos têm a oportunidade de mobilizar diferentes ferramentas digitais para fins de colaboração, especialmente quando estão envolvidos em atividades de pesquisa ou investigações. Mas essas ferramentas podem ser usadas em contextos diferentes, formais ou informais, dependendo de quais são usadas. Daí o interesse em examinar os processos interativos em ação em ambos os casos, assim como a transição gradual de um para o outro provavelmente explicará por que os participantes se distanciam um pouco dos órgãos oficiais para trabalharem juntos. A hipótese então é que essa transição provavelmente dará à atividade coletiva uma dimensão heurística, em particular uma propensão à descoberta. Neste artigo, essa hipótese é testada com o apoio de um campo teórico (Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning) e de dados (qualitativos/quantitativos) de estudos recentes, levando em conta que outro fator (o tamanho dos grupos formados pelos alunos) parece desempenhar um papel significativo nessa questão.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Este trabalho encontra-se publicado com a Licença Internacional Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-CompartilhaIgual 4.0.
Referências
Audran, J. et Simonian, S. (2009). Étudier les communautés d’apprenants en ligne : quel(s) agencements(s) des méthodes de recherche? Éducation & Formation, e-290, 7-18. https://hal.science/hal-03174141v1
Baudrit, A. (2007). L'apprentissage collaboratif : plus qu'une méthode collective? De Boeck Supérieur.
Baudrit, A. (2018). L’apprentissage collaboratif en présentiel et à distance : deux modalités seulement différentiables? Éducation Comparée, 20, 243-269.
Baudrit, A. (2022). Les communautés d’apprentissage vues sous le prisme de la co-construction : des modalités collectives à géométrie variable? Les Dossiers des Sciences de l’Éducation, 46, 117-134. https://doi.org/10.4000/dse.5529
Baudrit, A. (2023). L’investigation collaborative : de la pratique d’enquête à la collaboration à distance. Peter Lang.
Baudrit, A. (2024). Les activités de recherche collective des élèves et des étudiants : de possibles glissements vers l’informel renforcés par les TIC? Psychologie & Education, 2, 19-32.
Bonfils, P. et Peraya, D. (2016). Processus décisionnels au sein de groupes d’étudiants en contexte de projet pédagogique : le cas d’étudiants à l’UFR Ingémédia de l’Université de Toulon. Communication & Organisation, 49, 57-71. https://doi.org/10.4000/communicationorganisation.5193
Cristol, D. (2017). Les communautés d’apprentissage : apprendre ensemble. Savoirs, 43, 10-55. https://doi.org/10.3917/savo.043.0009
Damon, W. et Phelps, E. (1989). Strategic uses of peer learning in children’s education. Dans T. J. Berndt et G. W. Ladd (dir.), Peer relationships in child development (p. 135-157). John Wiley & Sons.
Dewey, J. (1990). Démocratie et Éducation. Armand Colin (ouvrage original publié en 1916).
Dillenbourg, P. (1999). What do you mean by "collaborative learning"? Dans P. Dillenbourg (dir.), Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches (p. 1-19). Pergamon.
Dillenbourg, P. (2011). Pour une conception intégrée du tutorat de groupe. Dans C. Depover, B. De Lièvre, D. Peraya, J. J. Quintin et A. Jaillet (dir.), Le tutorat en formation à distance (p. 171-194). De Boeck Supérieur.
Dooly, M. et Tudini, V. (2022). « We should google that »: The dynamics of knowledge-in-interaction in an online student meeting. Classroom Discourse, 13(2), 188-211. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2021.2023596
Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strenght of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360-1380.
Hamel, J. (2021). Les étudiants et les étudiantes à la lumière de ce que nous savons sur les jeunes d’aujourd’hui. Éducation & Sociétés, 45, 193-206. https://shs.cairn.info/revue-education-et-societes-2021-1-page-193
Hsieh, M.-H., Chuang, H.-H. et Albanese, D. (2022). Investigating student agency and affordances during online virtual exchange projects in an ELF context from an ecological CALL perspective. System, 109, article 102888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2022.102888
Istenič, A. (2021). Online learning under COVID-19: Re-examining the prominence of video-based and text based feedback. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(1), 117-121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-09955-w
Jonassen, D., Davidson, M., Collins, M., Campbell, J. et Bannan Haag, B. (1995). Constructivism and computer mediated communication in distance education. The American Journal of Distance Education, 9(2), 7-26.
Kalmar, E., Aarts, T., Bosman, E., Ford, C., de Kluijver, L., Beets, J., Veldkamp, L., Timmers, P., Besseling, D., Koopman, J., Fan, C., Berrevoets, E., Trotsenburg, M., Maton, L., van Remundt, J., Sari, E., Omar, L-W, Beinema, E., Winkel, R. et van der Sanden, M. (2022). The COVID-19 paradox of online collaborative education: When you cannot physically meet, you need more social interactions. Heliyon, 8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e08823
Koschmann, T. (1994). Toward a theory of computer support for collaborative learning. The Journal of The Learning Sciences, 3(3), 219-225.
Lemoisson, P., Cerri, S. A., Douzal, V., Dugénie, P. et Tonneau, J.-P. (2021). Collective and informal learning in the ViewpointS Interactive Medium. Information 2021, 12(5), 183. https://doi.org/10.3390/info12050183
Li, P.-J., Hong, H.-Y., Chai, C.-S. et Lin, P.-Y. (2020). Fostering students’ scientific inquiry through computer-supported collaborative knowledge building. Research in Science Education, 50, 2035-2053. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9762-3
Madge, C., Breines, M. R., Dalu, M. T. B., Gunter, A., Mittelmeier, J., Prinsloo, P.et Raghuram, P. (2019). WhatsApp use among African International Distance Education (IDE) students: Transferring, translating and transforming educational experiences. Learning, Media & Technology, 44(3), 267-282. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2019.1628048
Majka, E. A., Guenther, M. F. et Raimondi, S. L. (2021). Science bootcamp goes virtual: A compressed, interdisciplinary online CURE promotes psychosocial gains in STEM transfer students. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v22i1.2353
Nungu, L, Mukama, E. et Nsabayezu, E. (2023). Online collaborative learning and cognitive presence in mathematics and science education. Case study of University of Rwanda, College of Education. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11607-w
Olshannikova, E., Olsson, T., Huhtamäki, J., Paasovaara, S. et Kärkkäinen H. (2020). From chance to serendipity: Knowledge workers’ experiences of serendipitous social encounters. Advances in Human-Computer Interaction. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/1827107
O'Malley, C. (dir.) (1994). Computer-supported collaborative learning. Springer.
Papi, C. (2024). Favoriser l’apprentissage et le bien-être. Tutorat et autres dispositifs d’accompagnement. Presses de l’Université de Québec.
Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L. A., de Jong, T., van Riesen, S. A. N., Kamp, E. T., Manoli, C. C., Zacharia, Z. C. et Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational Research Review, 14, 47-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.003
Pène, S. (2017). Postface. La pédagogie universitaire, cœur de la transition numérique. Dans L. Massou et N. Lavielle-Gutnik (dir.), Enseigner à l’université avec le numérique (p. 251-264). De Boeck Supérieur.
Peraya, D. (1998). Les dispositifs de communication éducative médiatisée : médiation et médiatisation. Actes du Congrès SFSIC. Avignon, 17-18-19 septembre 1998.
Roland, N. et Talbot, L. (2014). L’environnement personnel d’apprentissage : un système hybride d’instruments. STICEF, 21, 289-316. https://www.persee.fr/doc/stice_1764-7223_2014_num_21_1_1100
Saadatmand, M. et Kumpulainen, K. (2013). Content aggregation and knowledge sharing in a personal learning environment: Serendipity in open online networks. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 8(1), 70-78. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v8iS1.2362
Schneider, M. et Stern, E. (2010). L’apprentissage dans une perspective cognitive. Dans H. Dumont, D. Istance et F. Benavides (dir.), Comment apprend-on? La recherche au service de la pratique (p. 73-95). Éditions OCDE. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264086944-5-fr
Sharma, N., Colucci-Gray, L., Van DerWal, R. et Siddharthan, A. (2022). Consensus building in on-line citizen science. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 6 (CSCW2). https://doi.org/10.1145/3555535
Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1), 1-8.
Walker, U. et Haddon, R. (2011). Foreign language learning conceptualisations of distance learners in New Zealand: Goals, challenges and responses. The Language Learning Journal, 39(3), 345-364.
Wang, Y. et Ewert, D. (2021). Engaging undergraduate students in biomedical research project: A virtual collaboration across institutes under the pandemic environment. Conference Proceedings – Frontiers in Education Conference FIE. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE49875.2021.9637452
Wong, G. K. W., Li, Y. K. et Lai, X. (2021). Visualizing the learning patterns of topic-based social interaction in online discussion forums: An exploratory study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69, 2813-2843. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-10040-5