MOOC certificates : past and current debates over a rapidly evolving object

Main Article Content

Matthieu Cisel

Abstract

During the early 2010s, MOOCs acquired a considerable notoriety ; hundreds of thousands of their certificates, free at first, flooded the Web. Many believed that the end of the diplomas as we knew them was near. Some started comparing the success of these courses based on the number of certificates that were delivered. More often than not, the increasingly numerous debates over these questions tended to forget the diversity of situations these certificates encompassed. Some indeed validated skills, but most of them were the digital equivalent of an attendance sheet, as suggested by an investigation we carried out into course designers’ motivations. After interpreting this diversity, we focus here on the debates brought about by the renewal of these certificates. They are no longer free, and the private sector has gained momentum, which leads to many questions over the future of this new generation of certificates in academia.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Cisel, M. (2018). MOOC certificates : past and current debates over a rapidly evolving object. Mediations and Mediatizations, 1(1), 97–101. https://doi.org/10.52358/mm.v1i1.60
Section
Discussions and debates

References

Cisel, M. (2018a). Les MOOC français à l’épreuve de la viabilité économique. Revue française des sciences de l’information et de la communication, (12). https://doi.org/10.4000/rfsic.3355

Cisel, M. (2018b). Une analyse automatisée des modalités d’évaluation dans les MOOC. International Journal of E- Learning & Distance Education, 33(1). http://ijede.ca/index.php/jde/article/view/1052

D’Oliveira, C., Carson, S., James, K., & Lazarus, J. (2010). MIT OpenCourseWare: Unlocking Knowledge, Empowering Minds. Science, 329(5991), 525–526. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.11826962

Evans, S., & Myrick, J. G. (2015). How MOOC instructors view the pedagogy and purposes of massive open online courses. Distance Education, 0(0), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2015.1081736

Roediger, H., & Karpicke, J.. (2006). Test-Enhanced Learning: Taking Memory Tests Improves Long-Term Retention. Psychological Science, 17(3), 249–255. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01693.x

Jordan, K. (2015). Massive open online course completion rates revisited: Assessment, length and attrition. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(3). http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/2112

Kolowich, S. (2013). The Professors behind the MOOC Hype. Chronicle of Higher Education.

Margaryan, A., Bianco, M., & Littlejohn, A. (2015). Instructional quality of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs). Computers & Education, 80, 77–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.08.005

Toven-Lindsey, B., Rhoads, R. A., & Lozano, J. B. (2015). Virtually unlimited classrooms: Pedagogical practices in massive open online courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 24, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.07.001