Open Educational Resources (OER) and AI in Evolution: Feedback and Prospects

Main Article Content

Christopher Fuhrman
Mouna Moumene

Abstract

The recent emergence of generative artificial intelligence (GAI) in the field of education has influenced the transformation of teaching practices. GAI has opened new perspectives for the design of digital, interactive, personalized, and adaptive educational resources. Questions have emerged about the potential of using GAI in the creation of open educational resources (OER) based on open teaching practices. This article presents feedback on the design of a modular OER dedicated to software analysis and design, developed using free tools and distributed under a Creative Commons CC-BY license, as well as its use, impact, updating, and improvement. It describes the gradual integration of GAI into the pedagogical production and improvement process. Several uses have been explored: linguistic and stylistic revision, automatic generation of questionnaires, creation of virtual tutors, and experimentation with ChatGPT-5's “Study and Learn” mode. The authors present the advantages of the uses with which they have experimented, while highlighting the technological, legal, and ethical limitations they encountered during their explorations. Based on their findings, they offer recommendations to OER creators on the use of AI for the creation and evolution of OERs.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Fuhrman, C., & Moumene, M. (2026). Open Educational Resources (OER) and AI in Evolution: Feedback and Prospects. Mediations and Mediatizations, (23), 194–208. https://doi.org/10.52358/mm.vi23.492
Section
Practitioners' articles

References

Athaluri, S. A., Manthena, S. V., Kesapragada, V. K. M., Yarlagadda, V., Dave, T. et Duddumpudi, R. T. S. (2023). Exploring the boundaries of reality: investigating the phenomenon of artificial intelligence hallucination in scientific writing through ChatGPT references. Cureus, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.37432 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.37432

Dedehayir, O. et Steinert, M. (2016). The hype cycle model: A review and future directions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 108, 28-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.04.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.04.005

DeepL (2025). DeepL Translator. https://www.deepl.com/translator.

Ding, T., Li, J., Shi, X., Li, X., et Chen, Y. (2023). Is artificial intelligence associated with carbon emissions reduction? Case of China. Resources Policy, 85(B). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103892 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103892

Francoeur, E., Yogarajah, A. et Rolo-Dussault, M. (2025). Voltaire: an AI Chatbot to Enhance Evidence-Based Argumentation on Technology and Society [communication]. SALTISE Conference.

Fuhrman, C. et Ross, Y. (2023). Analyse et conception de logiciels. École de technologie supérieure. fabriqueREL. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10520271

Gartner (2023, 16 août). Gartner Places Generative AI on the Peak of Inflated Expectations on the 2023 Hype Cycle for Emerging Technologies. https://www.gartner.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2023-08-16-gartner-places-generative-ai-on-the-peak-of-inflated-expectations-on-the-2023-hype-cycle-for-emerging-technologies

Gartner (2025, 5 août). Gartner Hype Cycle Identifies Top AI Innovations in 2025. https://www.gartner.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2025-08-05-gartner-hype-cycle-identifies-top-ai-innovations-in-2025

Gartner (s.d.). Gartner Hype Cycle. https://www.gartner.com/en/research/methodologies/gartner-hype-cycle

Germain, É., Guibault, F. et Radoev, N. (2024). Réorganisation de l’enseignement dans un cours introductif en analyse et conception de logiciels| Reorganization of Teaching in an Introductory Course in Software Analysis and Design. Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA). https://doi.org/10.24908/pceea.2024.18581 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24908/pceea.2024.18581

Ministère de l’Industrie du Canada (2021). Consultation sur un cadre moderne du droit d’auteur pour l’intelligence artificielle et l’Internet des objets. https://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/693.nsf/fra/00316.html

Ministère de l’Éducation du Québec. (2025). L’utilisation pédagogique, éthique et légale de l’intelligence artificielle générative : guide destiné au personnel enseignant 2024-2025. https://cdn-contenu.quebec.ca/.

OpenAI (2025a). ChatGPT. https://chat.openai.com.

OpenAI (2025b). ChatGPT-4.1 via Copilot dans Visual Studio Code. https://chat.openai.com.

Peters, M. (2023). Utilisation transparente de l’intelligence artificielle / Acronyms and Icons for a Transparent Use of AI. https://mpeters.uqo.ca/logos-ia-fr-peters-2023/.

Sallam, M. (2023). ChatGPT utility in healthcare education, research, and practice: systematic review on the promising perspectives and valid concerns. Dans Healthcare, 11(6), 887. MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11060887 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11060887

UNESCO (2021). Recommandation sur l’éthique de l’intelligence artificielle. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000381137_fre

Walters, W. H. et Wilder, E. I. (2023). Fabrication and errors in the bibliographic citations generated by ChatGPT. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 14045. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-41032-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-41032-5

Zewe, A. (2025, 17 janvier). Explained: Generative AI’s environmental impact. MIT News. https://news.mit.edu/2025/explained-generative-ai-environmental-impact-0117