Create, Innovate, Share: A Workflow Based on Artificial Intelligence to Produce Open Educational Resources Accessible to All

Main Article Content

Christophe Fournier
Mona Laroussi

Abstract

Education is a strategic lever for achieving several Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) as set out by the UN. However, it is being rolled out in a challenging demographic context characterized by a growing demand for education in many parts of the world, coupled with a lack of resources, both material (infrastructure, premises) and human (shortage of teachers). In this context, Open Educational Resources (OER) appear to be an educational tool of choice for promoting access to and dissemination of knowledge on a large scale. Generative artificial intelligence (AI) is now reinforcing this potential. Many EdTech companies offer solutions for automatically generating educational content that can be integrated into digital environments (LMS). However, creating high-quality OERs requires more than just the use of technology; it requires a rigorous approach, guided by educational and ethical principles. This article proposes a 10-step workflow for integrating generative AI into the design of OERs. Each step specifies the possible contributions of AI, examples of prompts and tools that can be used, supported by a summary table.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Fournier, C., & Laroussi, M. (2026). Create, Innovate, Share: A Workflow Based on Artificial Intelligence to Produce Open Educational Resources Accessible to All. Mediations and Mediatizations, (23), 209–229. https://doi.org/10.52358/mm.vi23.486
Section
Discussions and debates
Author Biography

Mona Laroussi, Institut de la Francophonie pour l’éducation et la formation

Professeure des Universités, Directrice de l’Institut de la Francophonie pour l’Education et la Formation

References

Avraamidou, L. (2024). Can we disrupt the momentum of the AI colonization of science education? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 61(10), 2570-2574. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21961 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21961

Bender, E. M., Gebru, T., McMillan Major, A., et Shmitchell, S. (2021). On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big? Dans Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) (p. 610-623). https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445922 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445922

Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., et Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. Longmans, Green.

Brown, T., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J. D., Dhariwal, P., Neelakantan, A., Shyam, P., Sastry, G., Askell, A., Agarwal, S., Herbert-Voss, A., Krueger, G., Henighan, T., Child, R., Ramesh, A., Ziegler, D., Wu, J., Winter, C., … Amodei, D. (2020). Language Models are Few-Shot Learners. Dans H. Larochelle, M. Ranzato, R. Hadsell, M. F. Balcan, et H. Lin (dir.), Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (Vol. 33, p. 1877‑1901). Curran Associates Inc. https://proceedings.neurips.cc/

Bulathwela, S., Pérez-Ortiz, M., Holloway, C., Cukurova, M., et Shawe-Taylor, J. (2024). Artificial intelligence alone will not democratise education: On educational inequality, techno-solutionism and inclusive tools. Sustainability. 16(2), 781. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16020781 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16020781

Celik, I., Dindar, M., Muukkonen, H., et Järvelä, S. (2022). The promises and challenges of artificial intelligence for teachers: A systematic review of research. TechTrends, 66, 616-630. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-022-00715-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-022-00715-y

Chan, C. (2023). A comprehensive AI policy education framework for university teaching and learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, article 38. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00408-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00408-3

Compilatio (2023, 17 juillet). Les menaces et les limites des IA dans l’enseignement. https://www.compilatio.net/blog/limites-ia-enseignement

Dublin Core Metadata Initiative (2022). Dublin Core metadata element set, version 1.1. https://www.dublincore.org/documents/dces/

E Skilled AI Course Creator. (2025, 1er juillet). Avantages et utilisations de l’IA dans l’éducation : statistiques clés sur l’IA. https://aicoursecreator.eskilled.io/fr/blog/avantages-et-utilisations-de-lia-dans-leducation-statistiques-cles-sur-lia/

European Commission (2022). Ethical guidelines for educators on using artificial intelligence and big data in teaching and learning. Directorate General for Education, Youth, Sport and Culture. https://education.ec.europa.eu/news/ethical-guidelines-on-the-use-of-artificial-intelligence-and-data-in-teaching-and-learning-for-educators

fabriqueREL (s.d.). Le parcours de création en 6 étapes. https://fabriquerel.org/processus-de-creation

Fournier, C., Laroussi, M. (2023). Les ressources éducatives libres pour tous et tout au long de la vie en réponse à l’objectif de développement durable n°4. Dans F. Chevalier et M. Kalika (dir.), Recherches sur la sustainability. Éditions EMS.

France Éducation International (2022). « Université sans les murs » : vers un enseignement hybride au Togo. https://www.france-education-international.fr/actualites/lettre-fei/2022-02/universite-sans-les-murs

IMS Global Learning Consortium. (2022). Learning Tools Interoperability (LTI) 1.3: Core specification. IMS Global Learning Consortium. https://www.imsglobal.org/spec/lti/v1p3

Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy: An Overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(4), 212-218. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2

Laroussi, M. (2012). Scénarios d’apprentissage flexibles. Dans C. Depover et B. De Lièvre (dir.), Industries de la connaissance, éducation, formation et technologies. Bruxelles : De Boeck.

Mulyani, H., Istiaq, M. A., Shauki, E. R., Kurniati, F., & Arlinda, H. (2025). Transforming education: exploring the influence of generative AI on teaching performance. Cogent Education, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2448066 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2448066

OECD (2024) OECD Digital Economy Outlook 2024 (Volume 1) Embracing the Technology Frontier. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/a1689dc5-en DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/a1689dc5-en

Popenici, S. A. D., et Kerr, S. (2017). Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence on teaching and learning in higher education. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 12, article 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-017-0062-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-017-0062-8

Saklani, S., et Singh, D. (2024). Minimizing carbon emissions by improving water and energy use efficiencies in AI servers: A green cloud computing strategy for sustainable artificial intelligence systems. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 9(9). https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24SEP1195 DOI: https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24SEP1195

Smith, B., Schatz, S., et Tuner, J. (2021). Total learning architecture data model for analytics and interoperability. ADL Initiative. IITSEC 2021 Paper No. 21358 https://www.adlnet.gov/assets/uploads/2021 --- (IITSEC) Total Learning Architecture Data Model for Analytics and Adaptation.pdf

UNESCO (2019). La Recommandation 2019 de l’UNESCO sur les ressources éducatives libres (REL) : soutenir l’accès universel à l’information grâce à des matériels d’apprentissage ouverts de qualité. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000383205_fre.locale=en

UNESCO (2020). AI and education: Guidance for policy makers. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000376709

UNESCO (2021) Repenser nos futurs ensemble : un nouveau contrat social pour l’éducation. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000388310.locale=en

UNESCO (2023). Guidance for generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in education and research. https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/guidance-generative-ai-education-and-research

Van den Berg, G., et du Plessis, E. (2023). ChatGPT and generative AI: Possibilities for its contribution to lesson planning, critical thinking and openness in teacher education. Education Sciences, 13(10), 998. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13100998 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13100998

Wiley, C. (2014). Metadata use in research data management. Bulletin of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 40(6), 40-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bult.2014.1720400612

World Bank (2023). Primary school enrolment in Nigeria has increased over two decades, with more male enrolments annually. Intelpoint. https://intelpoint.co/insights/primary-school-enrolment-in-nigeria-has-increased-over-two-decades-with-more-male-enrolments-annually/

Zawacki Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., et Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – Where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0

Zou, D., Xie, H., et Kohnke, L. (2025). Navigating the future: Establishing a framework for educators’ pedagogic artificial intelligence competence. European Journal of Education, 60. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70117 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70117