Análise crítica das perspetivas antecipadas dos futuros professores sobre a automatização das atividades de Ensino
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Resumo
Estudos recentes mostram que a introdução da inteligência artificial na profissão docente pode gerar tensões psicológicas ou preocupações profissionais, especialmente quando a IA é vista como uma ameaça ao seu papel ou à sua experiência, em vez de um recurso complementar. Mobilizando a teoria da atividade e dos afetos, este estudo exploratório teve como objetivo compreender a reconfiguração das atividades da profissão docente a partir do ponto de vista dos futuros professores. Um questionário foi aplicado a 86 professores em formação inicial sobre dez atividades típicas. Os resultados revelam quatro configurações de atividades, independentemente do nível de facilidade ou apego dos participantes a essas atividades, mas mais à natureza e ao lugar da atividade na profissão docente.
Downloads
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Este trabalho encontra-se publicado com a Licença Internacional Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-CompartilhaIgual 4.0.
Referências
An, P., Bakker, S., & Eggen, B. (2017). Understanding teachers’ routines to inform classroom technology design. Education and Information Technologies, 22(4), 1347-1376. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-016-9494-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-016-9494-9
Bouakaz, L., & Khalid, S. (2025). AI in education: A sociological exploration of technology in learning environments. Frontiers in Education, 10, article 1700876. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1700876 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1700876
Browes, N., & Altinyelken, H. K. (2022). Professionalism in the era of accountability: Role discrepancy and responses among teachers in the Netherlands. The British Journal of Sociology, 73(1), 188-205. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12917 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12917
Chaudhry, M. A., & Kazim, E. (2022). Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIEd): A high-level academic and industry note 2021. AI and Ethics, 2(1), 157-165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-021-00074-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-021-00074-z
Cheng, X., Xie, H., Hong, J., Bao, G., & Liu, Z. (2022). Teacher’s emotional display affects students’ perceptions of teacher’s competence, feelings, and productivity in online small-group discussions. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, article 795708. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.795708 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.795708
Celik, I. (2023). Towards Intelligent-TPACK: An empirical study on teachers’ professional knowledge to ethically integrate artificial intelligence (AI)-based tools into education. Computers in Human Behavior, 138, 107468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107468 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107468
Dangol, A., Kotiyal, S., Wolfe, R., Bowers, A. J., Vigil, A., Yip, J., Kientz, J. A., Shahid, S., Yeh, T., Cho, V., & Davis, K. (2025). Relief or displacement? How teachers are negotiating generative AI’s role in their professional practice (version 1). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2510.18296 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3772318.3791904
Dehen, M., Harari, R., & Aharony, N. (2026). Teachers’ artificial intelligence (AI) literacy: An exploratory study. Smart Learning Environments, 13, article 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-026-00433-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-026-00433-5
Dilekçi, Ü., Limon, İ., Manap, A., Alkhulayfi, A. M. A., & Yıldırım, M. (2025). The association between teachers’ positive instructional emotions and job performance: Work engagement as a mediator. Acta Psychologica, 254, article 104880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.104880 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.104880
Doyle, L., Nash, R. A., Jakcsiova, V., & Turner, E. (2025). ‘They want you to read their work’: Teachers’ and students’ perspectives on the use of AI for school feedback. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 30(4), 1917-1941. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-025-09903-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-025-09903-0
Engeström, Y. (2014). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139814744 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139814744
Ferman, B., Lima, L., & Riva, F. (2021). Artificial Intelligence, Teacher Tasks and Individualized Pedagogy (SocArXiv No. Qw249). Center for Open Science. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/qw249
Gohier, C., Anadón, M., Bouchard, Y., Charbonneau, B., & Chevrier, J. (2002). La construction identitaire de l’enseignant sur le plan professionnel: Un processus dynamique et interactif. Revue des sciences de l’éducation, 27(1), 3-32. https://doi.org/10.7202/000304ar DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/000304ar
Greene Nolan, H., Coenraad, M., & Young, V. (2024). Teaching partner, grading assistant, substitute teacher: Three ways teachers positioned an artificial intelligence tool in writing instruction. Digital Promise. https://doi.org/10.51388/20.500.12265/226 DOI: https://doi.org/10.51388/20.500.12265/226
Grimalt-Alvaro, C., & Ametller, J. (2021). A cultural-historical activity theory approach for the design of a qualitative methodology in science educational research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20.. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211060664 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211060664
Guillemette, F. (2006). L’engagement des enseignants du primaire et du secondaire dans leur développement professionnel [Doctoral dissertation, Université du Québec à Montréal, Canada]. https://archipel.uqam.ca/1939/
Huang, X., Lee, J. C.-K., & Frenzel, A. C. (2020). Striving to become a better teacher: Linking teacher emotions with informal teacher learning across the teaching career. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, article 1067. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01067 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01067
Isma’il, A., & Ibrahim, H. B. (2025). Teachers’ professional identity in the era of artificial intelligence: A phenomenological study. International Journal of Professional Development, Learners and Learning, 7(2), article e2517. https://doi.org/10.30935/ijpdll/17416 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30935/ijpdll/17416
Koh, J., Cowling, M., Jha, M., & Sim, K. N. (2025). Evaluation of the AI-teacher teaching tasks spectrum via practitioner review. Intelligent Technologies in Education. https://doi.org/10.53761/ITED/1.8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.53761/ITED/1.8
Kwarteng, J. T., & Sappor, P. (2021). Preservice teachers’ self-efficacy in teaching cost accounting. Education Research International, 2021, article 140161. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9140161 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9140161
Lin, Y., Jiang, Y., & Lei, J. (2025). Generative AI and teacher professional identity development: A case study on L2 Chinese reading materials development. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2025.2592620 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2025.2592620
Liu, Q., & Geertshuis, S. (2016). Professional identity and teachers’ learning technology adoption: A review of adopter-related antecedents. ASCILITE 2016 conference proceedings: Show me the learning (p. 365-374). ASCILITE Publications. https://doi.org/10.14742/apubs.2016.809 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14742/apubs.2016.809
McAvinia, C. (2016). Chapter 3 – Activity theory. In C. McAvinia (Eds.), Online learning and its users (p. 59-100). Chandos Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100626-9.00003-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100626-9.00003-4
Miettinen, R. (2001). Artifact mediation in Dewey and in cultural-historical activity theory. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 8(4), 297-308. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327884MCA0804_03 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327884MCA0804_03
Mishra, S. (2025). Artificial intelligence as a mediator between educator and learner: The new paradigm shift. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Applied Science, 10(7), 91-95. https://doi.org/10.51584/IJRIAS.2025.100700008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.51584/IJRIAS.2025.100700008
Oh, S., & Ahn, Y. (2024). Exploring Teachers’ Perception of Artificial Intelligence: The Socio-emotional Deficiency as Opportunities and Challenges in Human-AI Complementarity in K-12 Education. In A. M. Olney, I.-A. Chounta, Z. Liu, O. C. Santos, & I. I. Bittencourt (Eds.), International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education. AIED 2024 (p. 439-447). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14830. Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-64299-9_41 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-64299-9_41
Ought. (2023). Elicit [application Web]. https://elicit.org
Palet, L. (2023). Revaloriser les enseignant∙es par l’engagement? La reconnaissance du travail et ses implicites. Revue Française de Pédagogie, 221, 17-32. https://doi.org/10.4000/11w09 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/11w09
Perplexity AI. (2024). Perplexity [application Web]. https://www.perplexity.ai
Pi, Z., Yang, H. H., Chen, W., Hu, X., & Li, X. (2022). Editorial: The role of teachers’ emotions in students’ outcomes: From the perspective of interpersonal emotions. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, article 1075110. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1075110 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1075110
Reynolds, A. (1990). Developing a comprehensive teacher assessment program: New pylons on a well-worn path. ETS Research Report. Educational Testing Service. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2333-8504.1990.tb01339.x
Scherer, K. R. (2005). What are emotions? And how can they be measured? Social Science Information, 44(4), 695-729. https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018405058216 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018405058216
Selwyn, N. (2011). ‘It’s all about standardisation’ – Exploring the digital (re)configuration of school management and administration. Cambridge Journal of Education, 41(4), 473-488. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2011.625003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2011.625003
Selwyn, N. (2019). Should robots replace teachers? AI and the future of education. John Wiley & Sons.
Setiyowati, R., & Ardaniah, V. (2025). A systematic review of AI-based and teacher-based writing assessment. English Language and Literature International Conference (ELLiC) Proceedings, 8. https://jurnal.unimus.ac.id/index.php/ELLIC/article/view/18463
Tripathi, T., Sharma, S. R., Singh, V., Bhargava, P., & Raj, C. (2025). Teaching and learning with AI: A qualitative study on K-12 teachers’ use and engagement with artificial intelligence. Frontiers in Education, 10, article 1651217. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1651217 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1651217
Tripathi, P., Digar, S. F., Anjana, B., & Rakhi, T. (2025). AI in classrooms: Impact on teacher identity and autonomy. I-Manager’s Journal on School Educational Technology, 20(4), 39. https://doi.org/10.26634/jsch.20.4.21964 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26634/jsch.20.4.21964
Van Dijk, E. E., Van Tartwijk, J., Van Der Schaaf, M. F., & Kluijtmans, M. (2020). What makes an expert university teacher? A systematic review and synthesis of frameworks for teacher expertise in higher education. Educational Research Review, 31, article 100365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100365 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100365
Wang, J., Huang, F., & Teo, T. (2025). Emotional attachment and resistance to change in the use of technology: A study among Chinese university music teachers. PLOS One, 20(7), article e0327205. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0327205 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0327205
Xie, X., Du, C., Cheng, J., & Zhang, H. (2026). From believing to behaving: Unpacking teacher emotion as the mediator between information literacy self-efficacy and information-empowered teaching engagement. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, article 1696627. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1696627 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1696627