Penser l’éducation ouverte au prisme des capabilités : pourquoi les REL à l’ère des ia?
Barre latérale de l'article
Contenu principal de l'article
Résumé
L’éducation ouverte (EO) et les ressources éducatives libres (REL) s’appuient sur des valeurs démocratiques auxquelles peu de personnes s’opposent dans le champ de l’éducation. En effet, il s’agit de s’engager pour le partage des ressources permettant le développement de savoirs. Toutefois, le déploiement des REL semble freiné dans de nombreux établissements. Si les premières critiques s’adressent notamment à l’absence de politiques spécifiques et à la résistance du corps enseignant à les partager, s’ajoutent les disponibilités des ia génératives et la tension que ces techniques nourrissent avec le libre. Une reconceptualisation des REL semble alors nécessaire. Pour cela, la proposition est d’avoir recours à l’approche par capabilités, pour tenter de saisir la tension entre des valeurs partagées, mais des pratiques absentes, tant sur le plan institutionnel qu’individuel. En ayant recours aux processus d’opportunités et de liberté, c’est le pouvoir (d’)agir qui est en jeu lors d’une participation active à l’EO. En quoi les REL participent-elles à façonner un environnement professionnel capacitant pour les corps enseignant et estudiantin? L’article propose une place revalorisée pour les REL aujourd’hui que les ia sont disponibles, afin d’envisager une opérationnalisation plus confiante des cadres d’action pour l’EO.
Téléchargements
Renseignements sur l'article
Cette œuvre est sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d'Utilisation Commerciale - Partage dans les Mêmes Conditions 4.0 International.
Références
Admiraal, W. (2021). A Typology of Educators Using Open Educational Resources for Teaching. International Journal on Studies in Education, 4(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijonse.60 DOI: https://doi.org/10.46328/ijonse.60
Alombert, A. (2025). De la bêtise artificielle. Allia.
Arnoud, J., et Falzon, P. (2013). Changement organisationnel et reconception de l’organisation : des ressources aux capabilités. Activites, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.4000/activites.760 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/activites.760
Bansal, T., et Joshi, D. (2015). OER and Teacher Educators: Awareness and Barriers. Indian Journal of Open Learning, 24(1 et 2), 59-68.
Belikov, O., et Bodily, R. (2016). Incentives and barriers to OER adoption: A qualitative analysis of faculty perceptions. Open Praxis, 8(3), 235-246. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.8.3.308 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.8.3.308
Blomgren, C. (2018). OER Awareness and Use: The Affinity Between Higher Education and K-12. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(2). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i2.3431 DOI: https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i2.3431
Bollier, D. (2024). Challenges in Expanding the Commonsverse. International Journal of the Commons, 18(1), 288-301. https://doi.org/10.5334/ijc.1389 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ijc.1389
Bondolfi, T. (2016). Citoyens du Net : le 1er manuel d’eculture générale au travail, en formation, en famille. Édition Ynternet.org. https://tedxgeneva.net/wp-content/uploads/CDN1.0c-1.pdf
Bossu, C., et Willems, J. (2024). OER based capacity building to overcome staff equity and access issues in higher education. ASCILITE Publications, 22-26. https://doi.org/10.14742/apubs.2017.734 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14742/apubs.2017.734
Bozkurt, A. (2023). Generative AI, Synthetic Contents, Open Educational Resources (OER), and Open Educational Practices (OEP): A New Front in the Openness Landscape. Open Praxis, 15(3), 178-184. https://doi.org/10.55982/openpraxis.15.3.579 DOI: https://doi.org/10.55982/openpraxis.15.3.579
Butcher, N., Kanwar, A., et Uvalic-Trumbic, S. (2011). A basic guide to open educational resources (OER). Commonwealth of Learning; UNESCO.
Cape Town Open Education Declaration (2007). Unlocking the promise of open educational resources. https://www.capetowndeclaration.org
Cardon, D. (2019). Culture numérique. Presses de Sciences Po. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/scpo.cardo.2019.01
Cavignaux-Bros, D. (2023). Ingénierie pédagogique et numérique : une analyse selon l’approche par les capabilités. L’Harmattan.
Cengage Learning (2016). Open Educational Resources (OER) and the Evolving Higher Education Landscape [White Paper]. Cengage Learning. https://eliterate.us/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/wp_oer-evolving-higher-ed-landscape.pdf
Conole, G., Evans, J., et Sims, E. (2003). Use and reuse of digital images in teaching and learning. In A. Littlejohn (Ed.), Reusing online resources: A sustainable approach to e-learning (pp. 156-170). Kogan Page.
Cronin, C. (2017). Openness and Praxis: Exploring the Use of Open Educational Practices in Higher Education. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(5). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i5.3096 DOI: https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i5.3096
de Rosnay, M. D., et Stalder, F. (2020). Digital commons. Internet Policy Review, 9(4), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.14763/2020.4.1530 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14763/2020.4.1530
Ehlers, U.-D., et Kunze, K. (2021). Open Education and Training Where does Europe go from here? State of Play for an Emerging European OER Ecosystem. ENCORE+.
Farrow, R. (2017). Open education and critical pedagogy. Learning, Media and Technology, 42(2), 130-146. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2016.1113991 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2016.1113991
Farrow, R. (2025). Cosmopolitics and The Commons. Education Ouverte et Libre - Open Education, 3. https://doi.org/10.52612/journals/eol-oe.2025.e1632 DOI: https://doi.org/10.52612/journals/eol-oe.2025.e1632
Farrow, R., et Díez-Arcón, P. (2024). Understanding Innovation Vectors in the Use of Open Educational Resources. Open Praxis, 16(4), 526-546. https://doi.org/10.55982/openpraxis.16.4.702 DOI: https://doi.org/10.55982/openpraxis.16.4.702
Farrow, R., Iniesto, F., Pitt, R., Weller, M., et Bossu, C. (2025). Innovation with Open Educational Resources: An integrative review of drivers, barriers and enablers. Journal of Open, Distance, and Digital Education, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.25619/Y3YTE265
Fernagu Oudet, S. (2012). Favoriser un environnement « capacitant » dans les organisations. Dans E. Bourgeois et M. Durand (dir.), Apprendre au travail (pp. 201-213). Presses Universitaires de France. https://www.cairn.info/apprendre-au-travail--9782130588948-page-201.htm20 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/puf.bourg.2012.01.0201
Fernagu, S. (2023). Les Capabilités : une grille de lecture des conditions de la professionnalisation au travail et en formation. McGill Journal of Education, 57(1), 117-140. https://doi.org/10.7202/1102016ar DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/1102016ar
Flipo, F. (2005). Pour une écologisation du concept de capabilité d’Amartya Sen. Natures Sciences Sociétés, 13(1), 68-75. https://doi.org/10.1051/nss:2005010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/nss:2005010
Flowers, S., Hazlett, Z. S., Ramirez, M., Treibergs, K., Vinson, E., Smith, M. K., et Knight, J. K. (2024). Understanding how professional development opportunities affect open educational resource sharing. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1422383. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1422383 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1422383
Fournier, C., et Laroussi, M. (2023). Chapitre 7. Les ressources éducatives libres pour tous et tout au long de la vie en réponse à l’objectif de développement durable n°4. Dans F. Chevalier et M. Kalika, Recherches sur la Sustainability (p. 141-157). EMS Editions. https://doi.org/10.3917/ems.cheva.2023.01.0141 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/ems.cheva.2023.01.0141
Hart, C. S. (2012). The capability approach and education. Cambridge Journal of Education, 42, 275-282. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0305764X.2012.706393 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2012.706393
Henderson, S., et Ostashewski, N. (2018). Barriers, incentives, and benefits of the open educational resources (OER) movement: An exploration into instructor perspectives. First Monday. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v23i12.9172 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v23i12.9172
Kimmons, R. (2016). Expansive Openness in Teacher Practice. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 118(9), 1-34. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811611800901 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811611800901
Kılıçkaya, F., et Kic-Drgas, J. (2021). Issues of context and design in OER (open educational resources). Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(1), 401-405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09852-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09852-8
Kuo, Y.-C., Kuo, Y.-T., et Tseng, H. (2024). Exploring the Factors That Influence K-12 Teachers’ Use of Open Educational Resources. Education Sciences, 14(3), 276. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14030276 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14030276
Lachaîne, C., et Cotnam-Kappel, M. (2023). Pratiques éducatives ouvertes au postsecondaire en milieu minoritaire francophone au Canada : défis et possibilités pour viser l’équité linguistique. The Open/Technology in Education, Society, and Scholarship Association Journal, 3(2), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.18357/otessaj.2023.3.2.51 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18357/otessaj.2023.3.2.51
Lelli, S. (2008). Operationalising Sen’s capability approach: The influence of the selected technique. Dans F. Comim, M. Qizilbash, et S. Alkire (dir.), The Capability Approach. Concepts, Measures and Applications (p. 310-361). Cambridge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511492587.011
Lemay, M.-P. (2015). L’approche des capabilités de Martha Nussbaum face aux enjeux multiculturels des sociétés libérales occidentales. Ithaque, 16, 77-100. http://www.revueithaque.org/fichiers/Ithaque16/Lemay.pdf
Leonelli, S. (2023). Philosophy of Open Science (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009416368 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009416368
Li, Z., Pardos, Z. A., et Ren, C. (2024). Aligning open educational resources to new taxonomies: How AI technologies can help and in which scenarios. Computers & Education, 216, 105027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105027 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105027
Liesenfeld, A., et Dingemanse, M. (2024). Rethinking open source generative AI: Open washing and the EU AI Act. The 2024 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 1774-1787. https://doi.org/10.1145/3630106.3659005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3630106.3659005
Luo, T., Hostetler, K., Freeman, C., et Stefaniak, J. (2020). The power of open: Benefits, barriers, and strategies for integration of open educational resources. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 35(2), 140-158. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2019.1677222 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2019.1677222
Mahendraprabu, M., Kumar, K. S., Susanto, E., et Fathurrochman, Dr. I. (2022). Exploring the Opportunities and Challenges of Incorporating Open Educational Resources in India. International Journal of Emerging Knowledge Studies, 01(01), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.70333/ijeks-01-12-001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.70333/ijeks-01-12-001
Martin, L. (2024). Clarification conceptuelle de l’approche des environnements capacitants : un atout pour le développement professionnel et le processus de prise de décision de l’action pour les paramédicaux. Revue Francophone Internationale de Recherche Infirmière, 10(3), 100332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.refiri.2024.100332 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.refiri.2024.100332
Mayer, J. (2023). Open Educational Resources (OER) Efficacy and Experiences: A Mixed Methods Study. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 23(4), 773-798. https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2023.a908701 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2023.a908701
McGeary, B., Guder, C., et Ganeshan, A. (2021). Opening up Educational Practices through Faculty, Librarian, and Student Collaboration in OER Creation: Moving from Labor-intensive to Supervisory Involvement. Partnership: The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research, 16(1), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.21083/partnership.v16i1.6149 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21083/partnership.v16i1.6149
McLean, M., Abbas, A., et Ashwin, P. (2013). University knowledge, human development and pedagogic rights. Dans A. Boni et M. Walker (dir.), Human development and capabilities: Re-imagining the university of the twenty-first century (p. 30-43). Routledge.
Mirowski, P. (2018). The future(s) of open science. Social Studies of Science, 48(2), 171-203. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312718772086 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312718772086
Mouta, A., Pinto-Llorente, A. M., et Torrecilla-Sánchez, E. M. (2023). Uncovering Blind Spots in Education Ethics: Insights from a Systematic Literature Review on Artificial Intelligence in Education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-023-00384-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-023-00384-9
Mullen, R., Kydd, A., Fleming, A., et McMillan, L. (2021). A practical guide to the systematic application of nominal group technique. Nurse Researcher, 29(1), 14-20. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.2021.e1777 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.2021.e1777
Mullens, A. M., et Hoffman, B. (2023). The Affordability Solution: A Systematic Review of Open Educational Resources. Educational Psychology Review, 35(3), 72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09793-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09793-7
Murray, R. (2024). The Capability Approach, Pedagogic Rights and Course Design: Developing Autonomy and Reflection through Student-Led, Individually Created Courses. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 25(1), 131 150. https://doi.org/10.1080/19452829.2023.2261856 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19452829.2023.2261856
Nussbaum, M. C., et Sen, A. (1993). The Quality of Life. Clarendon & Oxford. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/0198287976.001.0001
Ossiannilsson, E., Ulloa Cazarez, R. L., Goode, C., Mansour, C., et Martins Gomes De Gusmão, C. (2024). Artificial Intelligence Use to Empower the Implementation of OER and the UNESCO OER Recommendation. Open Praxis, 16(2), 237-257. https://doi.org/10.55982/openpraxis.16.2.650 DOI: https://doi.org/10.55982/openpraxis.16.2.650
Otto, D. (2021). Driven by Emotions! The Effect of Attitudes on Intention and Behaviour regarding Open Educational Resources (OER). Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2021(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.606 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.606
Peter, S., et Deimann, M. (2013). On the role of openness in education: A historical reconstruction. Open Praxis, 5(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.5.1.23 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.5.1.23
Pulker, H., et Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2020). Openness reexamined: Teachers’ practices with open educational resources in online language teaching. Distance Education, 41(2), 216-229. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2020.1757412 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2020.1757412
Rodés, V., Gewerc-Barujel, A., et Llamas-Nistal, M. (2019). University Teachers and Open Educational Resources: Case Studies from Latin America. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i1.3853 DOI: https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i1.3853
Rodriguez Diaz, J. (2025). Vers une école capacitante : construire des environnements inclusifs et équitables. Revue suisse de pédagogie spécialisée, 15(01), 49-55. https://doi.org/10.57161/r2025-01-08 DOI: https://doi.org/10.57161/r2025-01-08
Salais, R. (2009). L’approche par les capacités et le travail. https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00430169v1
Savarieau, B. (2017). Pouvoir d’agir et environnements capacitants, de nouvelles voies de développement professionnel avec les technologies? Dans T. Ardouin, S. Briquet-Duhazé, et E. Annoot (dir.), Le champ de la formation et de la professionnalisation des adultes : attentes sociales, pratiques, lexique et postures identitaires (pp. 274-266). L’Harmattan.
Sen, A. (1999). Development as Freedom. AnchorBooks.
Slattery, P., Saeri, A. K., Grundy, E. A. C., Graham, J., Noetel, M., Uuk, R., Dao, J., Pour, S., Casper, S., et Thompson, N. (2025). The AI Risk Repository: A Comprehensive Meta-Review, Database, and Taxonomy of Risks From Artificial Intelligence. arXiv, v2. https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.12622 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2026.101517
Strowel, A. (2023). ChatGPT and Generative AI Tools: Theft of Intellectual Labor? IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 54(4), 491-494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-023-01321-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-023-01321-y
Tang, H., Lin, Y.-J., et Qian, Y. (2021). Improving K-12 Teachers’ Acceptance of Open Educational Resources by Open Educational Practices: A Mixed Methods Inquiry. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(6), 3209-3232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-10046-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-10046-z
Tlili, A., Zhang, J., Papamitsiou, Z., Manske, S., Huang, R., Kinshuk, et Hoppe, H. U. (2021). Towards utilising emerging technologies to address the challenges of using Open Educational Resources: A vision of the future. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(2), 515-532. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-09993-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-09993-4
UNESCO (2019). Recommendation on Open Educational Resources (OER). UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000370936
UNESCO (2024a). Dubai Declaration on Open Educational Resources (OER). UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000392271.locale=en
UNESCO (2024b). Guidelines on the implementation of the OER Recommendation. Action Areas 1, 2, 3, 4 & 5. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/search/84caec4f-ee25-4bad-b0e0-0e61e87b0af3
UNESCO (2024c). 3ème Congrès mondial sur les REL de l’UNESCO 2024. Biens publics numériques : solutions ouvertes et IA pour un accès inclusif à la connaissance. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000391562_fre
Van De, A., et Delbecq, A. L. (1971). Nominal Versus Interacting Group Processes for Committee Decision-Making Effectiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 14(2), 203-212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/255307
Weller, M. (2014). Battle For Open. How openness won and why it doesn’t feel like victory. Ubiquity Press. https://doi.org/10.5334/bam DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/bam
Wills, S., et Pegler, C. (2016). A Deeper Understanding of Reuse: Learning Designs, Activities, Resources and their Contexts. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2016(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.405 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.405