Compartiendo información de conocimiento contextual a través de aprendizaje a distancia asíncrono: Reflexiones desde punto de vista contextual en un proyecto de investigación en escuelas primarias
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
Este trabajo de investigación profundiza en la implementación efectiva de plataformas colaborativas para la investigación enfocadas a la educación primaria. En nuestro estudio se presenta a Edmodo como un medio para facilitar un diálogo asíncrono entre los alumnos de la Isla Guadalupe y la provincia de Quebec. La análisis presentada está basada en los vestigios digitales derivados de las actividades en línea de usuarios trabajando per dos proyectos de investigación de disciplinas distintas: una de ellas en linguística y la otra en educación para el desarrollo sustentable (ESD por sus siglas en inglés). En esencia, esta investigación comprende el proceso de presentar una herramienta colaborativa para propósitos educativos a una audiencia con distintos niveles de comprensión y experiencia en su uso. Del mismo modo, provee un análisis conceptual para la comprensión de los mensajes en línea que fueron intercambiados durante estas interacciones las cuales están relacionadas según su contexto.
Detalles del artículo
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Citas
Adam, F. & Westlund, H. (2013). Innovation in socio-cultural context. New York: Routledge. Bales, R. F. (1950). Interaction Process Analysis. Cambridge. MA: Addison-Wesley.
Chou, C. C. (2002). A Comparative Content Analysis of Student Interaction in Synchronous and Asynchronous Learning Networks. Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, https://doi.org/10.1109/hicss.2002.994093
Corno, L. & Mandinach, E.B. (1983, 06). The role of cognitive engagement in classroom learning and motivation. Educational Psychologist, 18(2), 88-108. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461528309529266
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P. & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
Depover, C. (2014). Quels modèles économiques et pédagogiques pour les MOOC? Distances et médiations des savoirs. Distance and Mediation of Knowledge, 2(5).
Dillenbourg, P. (1999). What do you mean by collaborative learning? In: P. Dillenbourg, (ed.), Collaborative Learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches (p. 1-19). Oxford: Elsevier.
Erlin, B., Yusof, N. & Rahman, A.A. (2008). Integrating Content Analysis and Social Network Analysis for analyzing Asynchronous Discussion Forum. Presented at the 2008 International Symposium on Information Technology, IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/itsim.2008.4631996
Forissier, T., Bourdeau, J. & Psyché, V. (2018). Quand les contextes se comparent et se parlent. Contextes et Didactiques, 10, 111-122.
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T. & Archer, W. (1999). Critical Inquiry in a Text-Based Environment: Computer Conferencing in Higher Education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2-3), 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6
Garrison, D. R. & Anderson, T. (2003). E-Learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice. London: Routledge/Falmer. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203166093
Garrison, D. R. & Arbaugh, J. (2007). Researching the community of inquiry framework: Review, issues, and future directions. The Internet and Higher Education, 10(3), 157-172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2007.04.001
Harasim, L. M. (1989). Online education: A new domain. In R. Mason & A. Kaye (Eds.), Mindweave: Communication, computers and distance education (p. 50-62). New York: Pergamon Press.
Henri, F. (1992). Computer conferencing and content analysis. In A.R. Kaye (Ed.), Collaborative learning through computer conferencing: The Najaden papers (p. 115-136). New York: Springer.
Herrington, J. A. (1997). Authentic learning in interactive multimedia environments. http://ro.ecu.edu.au/theses/1478
Lawson, H. A. (2004). The logic of collaboration in education and the human services. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 18(3), 225–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820410001731278
Marimuthu, R., Chone, L. S., Heng, L. T., Terng, H. F. & Nah, E. A. (2015). Creating a Community of Inquiry (CoI) through Edmodo. eProceeding UPALS Language Colloquium 2015. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.3064.0400
Moore, M. G. (1989). Editorial: Three types of interaction. American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923648909526659
P21 foundation (network of Battelle for Kids), (2007). Framework for 21st Century Learning. Washington DC, Partnership for 21st Century Learning. http://www.battelleforkids.org/networks/p21/frameworks-resources
Roschelle, J. & Teasley, S. D. (1995). The Construction of Shared Knowledge in Collaborative Problem Solving. Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (p. 69–97). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-85098-1_5
Siemens, G. (2004). Connectivism: A Learning Theory for the Digital Age. elearnspace. https://web.archive.org/web/20180706092208/http://www.elearnspace.org/Articles/connectivism.htm
Swan, K., Shea, P., Richardson, J., Ice, P., Garrison, D. R., Cleveland-Innes, M. & Arbaugh, J. B. (2008). Validating a measurement tool of presence in online communities of inquiry. E-mentor, 2(24), 1-12.
Swan, K., Garrison, D. R. & Richardson, J. C. (2009). A constructivist approach to online learning: the Community of Inquiry framework. In Payne, C. R. (Ed.) Information Technology and Constructivism in Higher Education: Progressive Learning Frameworks. (p. 43-57), Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
Vuopala, E., Hyvönen, P. & Järvelä, S. (2015). Interaction forms in successful collaborative learning in virtual learning environments. Active Learning in Higher Education, 17(1), 25–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787415616730
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wang, Q. & Woo, H. L. (2007). Comparing asynchronous online discussions and face-to-face discussions in a classroom setting. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(2), 272–286. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00621.x